“This Is My Story”

On the drive home from the west side, Third Day’s live rendition of Blessed Assurance came on my iPod. The lead vocalist started by telling the audience, “This is one of those songs we all sang growing up.”

And that’s true. I must have sung Blessed Assurance dozens of times as a kid in chapel, church, and youth group. It’s possible I sang it close to 100 times, but it never grabbed my attention the way it did tonight.

That’s not unusual.  Songs often don’t bear any relation to the events of our lives the first or second or tenth time we hear them. Lyric is limited. But life isn’t. And as life passes, it often reconnects with a lyric we’ve heard many times before. Tonight was such an occasion.

My life experience over the last half year has not been pleasant. The road has been tragic, and the tragedy is almost final. It was as I was grieving that this song came on tonight. The lyric at the start of the chorus got my attention: “This is my story. This is my song.”

I’ve grieved a loss these last six months. I’ve lost a lover, a friend, a confidant. Even still, I’ve taken comfort in knowing that God never promised I wouldn’t lose anyone. Instead, He promised to guide me through the loss.

So that’s my story, one of His provision when I was in need. And that’s my song, one of a Father’s love amid his child’s grief.

Thank you, Father, for making the old new.

Rush

Rush is a movie. It’s a really, really good movie.

Rush tells the story of two Formula I/III racers who make it to the top of their sport, creating a rivalry along the way. But the rivalry runs deeper than skill. These are two men who rival on how to live. The movie tells both stories very well, pointing up the virtues and vices of each. The sport adds excitement; it doesn’t get in the way. And the two leads are perfect for the roles they play.

At the end, the winner isn’t really the winner. And there’s a loser, but it’s not what you think. At stake isn’t just a grand prix. It’s a life’s philosophy on loyalty, risk, and permanence.

Life is to be lived aggressively. And when you stop living with urgency, you’ve already died.

The Way, Way Back

As of late, I’ve started watching movies more regularly. My mother would be disappointed. She’d rather I read.

Unlike television or video games, movies stay with you. They create characters with which we can identify. No one identifies with Special Agent Gibbs. Or Phil from Modern Family. Or Michael from The Office. Movies permit deeper, more complex role-playing and more intimate, less plot-focused stories. A good movie, then, is like a good book.

Tonight I watched The Way, Way Back.

I didn’t understand the title until the very end during a poignant scene in which the protagonist’s mother climbs from the front to the way, way back of her (soon-to-be) ex-boyfriend’s station wagon. I never had a station wagon growing up, but I can only assume that the seat in the back that so awkwardly faces the driver behind you was colloquially referred to as “the way, way back.”

The title’s fitting. The story is about a boy who spends his summer at his mother’s boyfriend’s beach house. The boyfriend, played by Steve Carrell, has a daughter, and she accompanies. She’s your stereotypical stuck-up, immature teenager. Carrell plays a dickish boyfriend, and he does quite well for the role (I haven’t seen him in many non-comedic roles). The mother is an insecure woman, attempting to find happiness after her last failed relationship and seemingly attempting to find happiness for her son, the protagonist, who doesn’t know that his father, in San Diego, doesn’t want him.

The story is told from the boy’s point of view. The plot is mostly irrelevant, moving only to assist with character development. The boy isn’t having fun but meets an attractive girl in a neighboring beach house who also isn’t having fun. The boy is awkwardly shy, but through happenstance meets the beach bum owner of a water park and finds a job. As a result of the friendships he makes with flawed, awkward, but truly salt-of-the-earth employees at this water park, he gains confidence, and he’s able to develop a healthy friendship with the girl, whose parents are also divorced.

The point of the story isn’t what happens, but why it happens. The what is that the boy witnesses Carrell making out with another woman and later calls him out on it. The mother, until the movie’s very end, cannot bring herself to break up with Carrell. And then she does. Oh, and the boy kisses the girl. Or vice versa? And movie over. So basically, a seemingly happy couple with kids of their own go to the beach, shit happens, and we’re left at the end to assume that the couple breaks up.

The depth of the movie, then, isn’t in the plot but in the themes. One is that kids watch their parents; and, more broadly, kids watch adults. Throughout the summer, the mother seems interested in finding personal happiness; if her son finds happiness as well, great, but she seems to assume that his happiness will come on her terms or as a result of her happiness.

We know this can’t happen. We know that if the mother learned how to find happiness as a child, then she and her child are not all that different, but many, many adults think as the mother does, ignoring their children and growing bitterness. Children are much more observant than we give them credit for. At such a young age, they watch in wonder — they watch television, they listen to their teachers, they explore their neighborhoods, and they observe their parents. It’s their nature. It’s how we mature, through observation.

I’m pointing up, probably for my own benefit, how important it is that parents (or adults) check themselves in front of their children. I’m not sure children are great at discernment, so they might not know whether mom or dad is faking happiness or ambivalence in order to keep the child protected. But it rarely matters. There’s not too much to discern when mom and dad are screaming at each other. Although kids may not discern too well, they observe keenly. When parents lose control and let their emotions take over, whether in a single moment or in the course of an entire relationship, the child sees what’s happening. He may not understand the complexities and the causes, but he does know what’s happening.

In the presence of your children, patience is selflessness.

The Way, Way Back

A second theme is that inspiring a child is a prime satisfaction. Money, fame, and celebrity status are all about me. The rat race is all about me. I can try to point the finger elsewhere and claim that I’m working for my wife, for my kids. And while that may be true on the surface, the real drive, the real focus is the achieved success. How beautiful it is when people are selfless enough to take a moment, to sacrifice their time or money, and just be involved with someone else. This isn’t about aggressively looking to inspire people; inspiration isn’t something we strive to do. It’s something that just results from selflessness.

A life worth living is one that gives itself away without any expectation of a return. But seriously, how often do we do that? Usually there’s at least something in it for us. We’re at least hoping that whomever we’re with will at least think we’re pretty cool.

But to just give yourself? It’s one of the most beautiful events. And it just so happens that it’s no coincidence that the Savior of the world did just that. Gave himself to death for us, not expecting that any of us would elect to live perfectly holy lives as a sort of “thank you.” He just did it because it was necessarily good. And he wasn’t some rich, famous celebrity. See, the hero of the movie is the beach bum owner of the water park. Not that this guy had achieved much in life, and not that his was a tale of success, and not that anyone should strive to live like he does. But in a single act of involved kindness, he changed the direction of a kid’s summer. And because the movie’s bigger than the movie, the implication is that he changed the direction of the kid’s entire childhood.

If a movie is thematically didactic — if it causes you to think when the credits start rolling — then it’s time well spent. Sit down with “The Way, Way Back,” and you’ll be glad you did.

The “Sandra Wilson” Scam

I’d say this is one of the more enticing scams I’ve encountered in my Craigslist experience primarily because it was carried out over weeks time by a sympathetic (and, consequently, credible) fraud.

Here’s how it hits you: You need a roommate (or, in my case, you’re looking to sublet). You advertise the room on Craigslist. You receive an email from sandrawilson010@aol.com. The fraud calls herself Sandra and claims to be living elsewhere in the country. My fraud claimed to be from Greece. (The fraud has terrible grammar; part of you is red-flagged, but another part of you attributes this to the alleged foreign origin.) The fraud claims to be interested in moving to your area, noting that “her uncle” told her it would be full of opportunities.

So where’s the scam? Continue: The fraud has to leave the country to care for her uncle, who allegedly is sick. The fraud maintains correspondence during the alleged trip. (The fraud does not message you for a number of days while “traveling.”) The fraud claims to be sending you a money order for the rental amount. (You are satisfied with a money order as it is like cash.) At some point, the fraud sends you a picture, which you assume to be the interested entity, although the image borders on “too good to be true” land. The fraud then tells you that the fraud’s personal items (e.g., a bed, suitcases of clothing, a computer desk, a car) will be shipped before the fraud arrives back stateside and that additional funds will be included in the money order to cover the shipping expenses. (The average cost to ship a car is $1,000.00.)

You are wary. Finally, you have been asked to pay something. The fact that the scam had not asked for payment until now (two weeks into correspondence) has made the scam appear credible up to this point. As you had not been asked to pay anything, you had no need to worry. Now, however, red flags should blind you. The fraud then self-inflicts a TKO (against the reasonably prudent person, that is) by telling you that instead of paying the shippers in person, you will need to mail them a check for the amount of the shipping; only once the shippers receive your payment will they ship the fraud’s items.

At this point, the disconnected person sees the scam. I fear that many people, though, have been won over by the endearing grammatical mistakes and attractive picture and have been suckered into sending money to the alleged shippers.

Once asked to send money, I Googled the email address from which I was receiving messages and found the following blog entry: http://in-myhumbleopinion.blogspot.com/2007/08/sandra-jones-i-can-smell-kind-of-person.html. That blog elaborates more of the story than I have. As you will read on that person’s blog, the fraud eventually asks that you wire the shipping money to Nigeria.

If nothing else up to this point has caused you angst, at long last, mention of Nigeria, the capital of scams, should set off every bell and whistle in even the most gullible person’s universe.

I hope anyone else whom this fraud attempts to scam will be enlightened by this blog entry.

Update: Other accounts that employ the name “Sandra Wilson” include: sandarwilson_5751@yahoo.com; jsandrajones01@aol.com; sanjones102@aol.com; sanjones100@aol.com; sanjones103@aol.com; sanjones400@aol.com; sanjones14814@gmail.com.

Other frauds of the same variety use the names Tina Jones (tinajones008@idioemail.com; tinajones008@live.com), Katherine Williams (willicomps072@aol.com; Katewille13@aol.com; katewille02@aol.com), Kate Wayne (waynecare12@gmail.com), Kristina James (kristybabao011@aol.com), Jennifer Matthews (jennifermatthe1@aol.com), Jenni Francis (jenifrancis005@aol.com), Natali Adams (mchllmcmii8@aol.com), Kaci (kacigl@aol.com), and Sarah (Serascoty07@aol.com).

The Truth Is Out There

The world is full of disinformation. Consequently, truth is extraordinarily rare.

At the moment, I’m thinking microcosmically. I’m thinking about those hurling accusations at the AZ legislature for its immigration bill. I’m thinking about those dismissing the reality of ecoterrorism and its possible connection to the recent oil spill. As my thoughts generalize, they encompass the different world religions that claim the truth about the soul, the different exercise routines that claim the truth about the body, and the different IQ tests that claim the truth about the mind.

The creation of factcheck.org was brilliant. It not only claims to possess truth but also makes it easily accessible to everyone. Everyone already has an opinion. Now people can simply reach their hands into the cookie jar of truths and make their opinions appear more veritable.

Historians, the traditional truth-gatherers, are a dying breed. Their cause of death is part-homicide, part-suicide. With regard to homicide, most people don’t read. Of those who do, most read only headlines, short articles, and inflammatory tabloids. This is why short articles are a dime a dozen. Very few read substantial articles. Even fewer read books. Only a sliver ever make it through a historical non-fiction.

With regard to suicide, most historians are bad writers. Perhaps it is their own collective fault, then, that they are disfavored. History need not be as dry and dusty as the pages on which it is written. From my experience, however, those who study historical research and writing rarely also study other brands of writing: creative, expository, novel, and legal. As a consequence, minutiae sprawl across hundreds of pages that will never be enjoyed by the proles. Should not history be accessible?

The truth is indisputable. The truth will set you free. As a result, he who presents the truth of the past with engaging dialogue will be a rich man.

The Moderate: Part II

Just as there is no inherently legitimate rationale for choosing the middle, there is no inherently legitimate basis for choosing the left or the right. Every day, thousands of Americans are born to red and blue families. Some stay the same color until the day they die. Is that good or bad? The answer is irrelevant. It doesn’t matter how long someone has been red or blue, because these labels are relative and misunderstood. What matters is what a person believes and why.

Continue reading

The Moderate: Part I

A few weeks ago, I forwarded a WSJ editorial entitled “The Empathy Paradox” to a few friends from law school. One of these friends is a self-proclaimed “moderate,” while the other two are self-proclaimed liberals. The editorial related a question and answer between Senator Kyl and Judge Sotomayor at the judge’s Senate confirmation hearings. One of the back and forths proceeded as follows:

Continue reading

A Legal Ethic

Although I’m not studying to become a professor, I wouldn’t consider myself the black sheep of the family.  My mom, dad, and sister—all undergraduate English majors—now teach some brand of literature, writing, or philosophy.  I, on the other hand, teach nothing, and my prospects in that direction don’t look too promising.  Of course, that’s only natural, because I don’t feel called to teach.  At least, not yet.  Instead, for the time being, I feel called to litigate.  In fact, I’m so confident that the law is where God wants me that, if I knew how genes worked, I might say it’s in my DNA.

What I cannot say so assertively is that the solutions to all of life’s ethical dilemmas are etched into my heart.  Let me be clear:  I almost always know the ethical course of action.  It’s the acting that doesn’t come easy.  I’ve probably said that going on a hundred times, and it’s becoming cliché, but I feel convicted every time I think about it.  Well, at least, I want to feel convicted.  I never want variety to supplant cliché when the cliché is actually worth remembering.

Continue reading

The Dew on the Roses

A relative newcomer to the adult world where consequences really matter, I nevertheless feel justifiably frustrated with the current state of politics.

It’s hardly partisan to describe our president as fearless, even reckless. Although the latter quality carries with it a negative connotation — and, thus, many liberals will reject it outright as a fit description of their leader — it’s a natural consequence of humanity let loose. At times, it’s an apt description of each of us.

Continue reading